Lessons learned from the BIG MAC: how to prevent trademark revocation for non-use

Written By

francesca rombola Module
Francesca Rombola

Associate
Italy

Here at Bird & Bird, I am a senior associate in our Intellectual Property Group in Milan with experience across the food and beverage, luxury, fashion and design sectors.

paola ruggiero Module
Paola Ruggiero

Counsel
Italy

As Counsel here at Bird & Bird, I have broad experience in Italian and European IP law, representing our clients from industries including food, fashion, entertainment, media, retail, finance and insurance, in trade mark, copyright and design matters.

The EUIPO Cancellation Division (the “Division”) ruled against the owner’s BIG MAC trademark registration, stating it should be revoked for non-use. This outcome was surprising given the BIG MAC burger is one of the most popular and well-known products in the fast-food market. On 14 December 2022,the EUIPO board of appeal(the “Board”) departed from the ruling granting revocation on the basis of non-use by partially upholding the appeal filed by the owner.

Latest insights

More Insights
featured image

Employment Litigation in Singapore: Employees Can Double-Strike with Employment Claims Tribunal Win Followed by High Court Claim

4 minutes Jul 11 2025

Read More
featured image

Singapore Issues Advisory to Stop Use of NRIC Numbers for Authentication

3 minutes Jul 11 2025

Read More
Keyboard and tablet on yellow background

(R)evolution in interfaces used to conclude distance contracts

Jul 11 2025

Read More